John Anderson interviews Walter Brueggemann

Click here to read it. (This is John’s promise us). The interview is succint;  Brueggemann’s answers are thought-provoking, imaginative,  and of course, post-modern as his approach to OT and Theology Of The Old Testament: Testimony, Dispute, Advocacy.  For example, he responds

The Old Testament invites the church to a narrative reality that is open, pluralistic, and beyond all codifications.  The God to whom it witnesses continues to break open our best ideologies.  In worship the church needs to hear and think through much, much more text, especially the parts we find implausible and unacceptable.  But that depends upon interpretation that takes seriously the complex refusal of the text to be ‘explained.

This ‘problematic’ presentation of God testifies against all of our ‘cozy’ notions of faith, liturgy, piety, doctrine, and morality.  The Old Testament and its God is to be received only in dispute and contestation.  It constitutes a wake-up call against complacency, easy conclusions, and dumbing down in faith.

A post-modernist or post-colonial reading of Scripture is profitable to combatt all non-sensical hermeneutics and  fixed interpretations and meanings which often defer the Text to speak in its voice. I remember reading Brueggemann’ Theology Of The Old Testament: Testimony, Dispute, Advocacy in an OT theology course in seminary my understanding of God and his Word were about to look different and evolved as it is today . I was convinced Brueggemann was right in most of his theological-imaginative assessment and interpretation of Scriptures.

[Via http://christmyrighteousness9587.wordpress.com]

Westlake Stark Tucker Coe Holt Clark, on pennames.

From an interview with Donald Westlake, author of the Parker series of crime novels:

Question: Other than Richard Stark, you have also published books under the names Samuel Holt, Tucker Coe, and Curt Clark, as well as under your given name of Donald Westlake. Why all the pennames?

Westlake: When you’re first in love, you want to do it all the time. I loved writing, and I was just pushing out too much stuff for a rational marketplace to contend with. I first started putting pen names on short stories because magazines wouldn’t publish the same byline twice in the same magazine.

With the novels, Westlake had a contract to do a book a year for Random House, so if I added a second publisher I would need a second name. By the time Tucker Coe came along, both Westlake and Stark had some reputation of their own, and an emotionally-grieving disgraced ex-cop, an open wound, didn’t belong to either of them.

Some years later, I had reached that point known by a lot of writers: What if I were starting now? In this changed market, would I succeed? So I tested the waters the same way Stephen King did with his Richard Bachman novels: throw it out there under cover of darkness, and see what happens. That’s where Samuel Holt came from. (King told me once that, when his agent said they absolutely needed the pen name now because they were printing the cover, he was reading a Richard Stark and listening to Bachman-Turner Overdrive. It really is all incestuous.)

[Via http://condalmo.wordpress.com]